Sunday, January 3, 2010

[JBirch] Congressional openings - Washington Times

While I hear and see vocal calls for replacing all 435 members of the lower
house and 33.3% of the upper house with "fresh" blood, it will NEVER HAPPEN.
For this to happen, someone must file to run against the existing body in
that position and if NOBODY does, then the existing boddie gets a free walk
for another term in office. Prime example is the 2nd Congressional seat in
Kansas. The candidate from the socialist-liberal party has withdrawn, there
is no other candidate from either of the "two major" parties contesting that
nomination, therefore as it stands today, the sitting boddie will get an
automatic election to that position. Bottom line, you have to have someone
running to replace the existing prima donna.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/dec/31/congressional-openings/?source=newsletter_opinion_more_news_carousel

By Donald Lambro

A number of House Democrats have announced they are retiring, and party
officials say more could follow in a tough midterm election year of high
unemployment, a slow economic recovery and a very angry electorate.

A growing number of Democrats have read the handwriting on the wall that
tells of bleak prospects for their party in 2010 when Republicans are
expected to pick up seats in the House and possibly in the Senate, too.

Historically, the party out of power makes gains in an administration's
midterm point, and that seems to be what is in store for the Democrats this
time around as well, if recent polls are any guide.

It is difficult to remember when the American people have expressed such a
deep level of disdain for Congress as they do now under the leadership of
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. The latest
NBC News-Wall Street Journal poll finds a pathetic 7 percent of Americans
give Congress an above average job approval score. Worse, 34 percent now
call this Congress one of the worst.

The survey numbers are especially bleak among incumbents. Only 38 percent
say their representative should be re-elected, and 49 percent say it's time
to give a new person a chance - the same percentage who said that before
Republicans took control of the House in 1994.

No one is saying that retirements alone endanger the Democrats' 258-seat
majority. Independent election analysts I've talked to say the number would
have to climb a lot higher before than can happen.

"Democrats aren't at the panic point in this process. Keep in mind that
Democrats lost 22 open seats in 1994. Right now, they only have seven
potentially open vulnerable seats, including the four recent retirements,"
said David Wasserman, senior House elections analyst at the Cook Political
Report, which closely tracks congressional races.

If Democrats can keep their retirements among vulnerable seats to between 10
to 15, "then I think they are in reasonably good shape," he said. "But if
that number balloons past 15, then I think that Democrats are in trouble."

As this is written, four Democrats have announced their retirement in the
past few weeks, including Reps. Dennis Moore of Kansas, John Tanner and Bart
Gordon of Tennessee, and Brian Baird of Washington state. Three other
Democrats were leaving the House to run for Senate seats: Reps. Joe Sestak
of Pennsylvania, Paul W. Hodes of New Hampshire and Charlie Melancon of
Louisiana.

The seats of the four pure retirements are vulnerable and considered tossups
at best. Arizona Sen. John McCain carried both Tennessee districts in the
2008 presidential election, and President Bush carried all four of the
retirement districts in his 2004 re-election.

Among them, Mr. Gordon was the most candid about the tough political climate
he faced next year and the factors that caused him to call it quits: "My
shelf life was starting to run out. Our district clearly is a more difficult
environment," he said in his retirement announcement.

Some are already being put in the Republican Party's column. "Democrats have
one open seat that might pretty much be a goner," analyst Charlie Cook said
of Mr. Melancon's conservative-leaning district.

Republican campaign officials say that they expect more retirements to come
as Democrats in more conservative districts acknowledge that their
re-election prospects are shaky.

"What a difference a year makes," said Rep. Pete Sessions of Texas, chairman
of the National Republican Congressional Committee, in a memo to his House
colleagues. "Democrats were at the peak of their political power following a
sweeping and historic election. Since then, Speaker Pelosi has successfully
steered her party into a political abyss so daunting that senior members of
her caucus would rather throw in the towel than face a disgruntled
electorate back home."

House Democratic campaign officials fear there may be more retirements to
come, but they dismiss Republican talk of a large exodus as mere "wishful
thinking by the Republicans."

"There could be some more Democratic retirements," said Ryan Rudominer,
spokesman for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, although he
declined to say how many.

For now, election handicappers do not think House Democrats are in danger of
losing majority control, although they are forecasting a larger Republican
pickup in seats.

"There is a good chance that Republicans can gain back the number of seats
they lost in 2008, 21 seats, which is about half of what they need to get
control of the House again," Mr. Wasserman told me. "Our current outlook is
a Democratic loss of 20 to 30 House seats."

Those losses could grow even larger next year if joblessness remains high,
forecasts of a weak recovery take hold, and there is an angry voter backlash
against the Democrats' big government tax-and-spend binge at the expense of
long-term economic growth and job creation.

Donald Lambro is chief political correspondent of The Washington Times.

------------------------------------

The opinions expressed on this forum are those of the authors of the articles posted. The John Birch Society has no responsibility for anything that is posted in this forum. The OFFICIAL John Birch Society web page is a www.jbs.org Visit The New American at www.thenewamerican.com for accurate information.

"The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing." Edmund Burke 1729-1797

What is The Answer To The Greatest Question?
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/097871461X?ie=UTF8&seller=A1AVPSERX4QF0E&sn=jperna12

Click here to find out:
http://reasonmustprevail.org/
or
http://1smartest.net/

Visit the ultimate resource for defending liberty

CLICK HERE:
http://targetfreedom.typepad.com:80/

1. Links to liberty defending organizations
2. Links to liberty defending web pages
3. Links to A MASSIVE assortment of liberty defending videos
4. A stream lined system for contacting legislators with suggested letters
5. Links to liberty defending egroups
6. Links to magazines, literature and other materials

Are you looking for a book about defending liberty?
Many rare and out of print books are still available.
Look here:
http://www.amazon.com/shops/jperna12

Then look here:
http://astore.amazon.com/targetfreedom-20

Then look here:
http://www.shopjbs.org/magento/
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JBirch/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JBirch/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
JBirch-digest@yahoogroups.com
JBirch-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
JBirch-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/